
AISSMS Institute of Information Technology
₹1.3L – ₹1.3L/yr
₹4.5 LPA
Most ranked lists do not tell you how they were ranked, which makes them impossible to argue with and therefore useless. This one states the method first: colleges are ordered primarily by branch-wise closing MHT-CET percentile, then by placement median, then by accreditation status. Where those three disagree, the cutoff wins, because it aggregates the judgement of thousands of informed students rather than one editor. On that method Pune produces a stable ordering. COEP Technological University leads on all three criteria simultaneously. A group of four autonomous colleges — PICT, VIT Pune, Cummins and PCCOE — follows closely and reorders slightly year to year depending on which branch you weight. The deemed universities sit outside this ordering entirely because they do not participate in CAP and therefore have no comparable cutoff. Below the top group the ranking becomes progressively less meaningful. Differences between the twelfth and twentieth college are within the noise of a single placement season, and any list that presents them as a firm ordering is overstating what the data supports.
⚡ Quick Answer
Ranking method: branch-wise closing MHT-CET percentile first, then branch-wise placement median, then NBA/NAAC accreditation. On that basis COEP Technological University leads on all three, followed by a closely grouped set of autonomous colleges — PICT, VIT Pune, Cummins College of Engineering for Women, PCCOE — whose order shifts with which branch you weight. Deemed universities sit outside the ranking because they do not participate in CAP. Below the top group, differences are within noise.
| Criterion | Weight | Why It Is Used |
|---|---|---|
| Branch-wise closing CET percentile | Primary | Aggregates thousands of informed choices; hardest metric to manipulate |
| Branch-wise placement median | Secondary | Reflects the typical outcome, unlike the average or the highest package |
| NBA / NAAC accreditation | Tertiary | Independent verification of programme and institutional quality |
| NIRF rank | Tie-breaker only | Many capable Pune colleges do not participate at all |
| Highest package | Not used | A single outlier offer tells you nothing about a typical student |
| Placement percentage alone | Not used | Meaningless without the recruiter list and salary distribution |
| Group | Colleges | Why They Are Grouped | Fees/yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COEP Technological University | Leads on cutoff, placement and accreditation simultaneously | ₹15K–95K |
| 2 | PICT, VIT Pune, Cummins, PCCOE | Separated by less than the year-to-year variation | ₹1L–2L |
| Parallel | MIT-WPU, BVDU, DY Patil, SIT | Outside CAP; no comparable cutoff exists | ₹2L–4L |
| 3 | Established SPPU-affiliated colleges | Wide band, ordered mainly by branch strength | ₹85K–1.6L |
| 4 | Newer private colleges | Insufficient placement history to rank meaningfully | ₹85K–1.4L |
📊
Method First
Ranking Criteria Stated
📋
Cutoff
Primary Signal
💼
Median CTC
Second Signal
✅
NBA / NAAC
Third Signal
49 colleges found

₹1.3L – ₹1.3L/yr
₹4.5 LPA

₹1.0L – ₹5.5L/yr
₹6.0 LPA

₹37,333 – ₹2.0L/yr
₹3.5 LPA

₹7.0L – ₹17.5L/yr
₹5.5 LPA

₹1.0L – ₹2.8L/yr
₹6.5 LPA
🎓 Get free guidance on Pune colleges — our expert calls you back within 2 hrs

₹92,500 – ₹1.9L/yr
₹4.5 LPA

₹72,728 – ₹2.9L/yr
₹4.5 LPA

₹39,000 – ₹2.0L/yr
₹3.5 LPA

₹76,500 – ₹3.3L/yr
₹5.5 LPA

₹86,500 – ₹3.7L/yr
₹4.0 LPA

₹1.0L – ₹4.7L/yr
₹6.0 LPA

₹11,739 – ₹3.6L/yr
₹5.0 LPA

₹86,973 – ₹4.2L/yr
₹3.0 LPA

₹1.1L – ₹9.0L/yr
₹6.5 LPA

₹2.1L – ₹9.9L/yr
₹7.0 LPA

₹36,667 – ₹5.4L/yr
₹9.3 LPA

₹3.8L – ₹5.1L/yr
₹4.2 LPA

₹35,000 – ₹5.0L/yr
₹4.5 LPA

₹7.2L – ₹7.2L/yr
₹3.8 LPA

₹3.9L – ₹8.1L/yr
₹3.7 LPA
Showing 20 of 49